- 0.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- 0.1 Program Objectives and Participants
- 0.1.1 The Pan-Arctic Region: Highlights of the Literature Review
- 0.1.1.1 Behavior and Fate of Oil in the Arctic
- 0.1.1.2 VECs and Ecotoxicity
- 0.1.2 Role of Ecosystem Consequence Analyses in NEBA Applications for the Arctic
- 0.1.2.1 Arctic Population Resiliency and Potential for Recovery
- 0.2 Priority Recommendations to Enhance NEBA Applications in the Arctic
- 0.2.1 Development of ARCAT Matrices
- 0.2.2 Influence of Oil on Unique Arctic Communities
- 0.2.3 Biodegradation in Unique Communities
- 0.2.4 Modeling of Acute and Chronic Population Effects of Exposure to OSRs
- 0.3 Further Information
- 1.0 THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
- 1.1 Introduction
- 1.1.1 The Arctic Ocean, Marginal Seas, and Basins
- 1.2 Knowledge Status
- 1.2.1 The Circumpolar Margins
- 1.2.2 Arctic Hydrography
- 1.2.3 Ice And Ice-Edges
- 1.2.4 Seasonality: Productivity and the Carbon Cycle in the Arctic
- 1.3 Future Research Considerations
- 1.3.1 Priority Recommendations to Enhance NEBA Applications in the Arctic
- 1.4 Further Information
- 2.0 ARCTIC ECOSYSTEMS AND VALUABLE RESOURCES
- 2.1 Introduction
- 2.2 Knowledge Status
- 2.2.1 Habitats of the Arctic
- 2.2.2 Arctic Food Webs
- 2.2.2.1 Pelagic Communities
- 2.2.2.2 Benthic and Demersal Communities
- 2.2.2.2 Sea-ice Communities
- 2.2.2.4 Mammals and Birds
- 2.2.2.5 Communities of Special Significance
- 2.2.3 Pelagic Realm
- 2.2.3.1 Phytoplankton
- 2.2.3.2 Zooplankton
- 2.2.3.3 Neuston
- 2.2.3.4 Other Pelagic Invertebrates
- 2.2.3.4.1 Krill
- 2.2.3.4.2 Amphipods
- 2.2.3.4.3 Cephalopods
- 2.2.3.4.4 Jellyfish
- 2.2.3.5 Fish
- 2.2.3.5.1 Pelagic Fish
- 2.2.3.5.2 Anadromous Fish
- 2.2.3.5.3 Demersal Fish
- 2.2.3.5.4 Deep-Sea Fish
- 2.2.3.6 Marine Mammals
- 2.2.3.6.1 Bowhead Whale (Balaena mysticetus)
- 2.2.3.6.2 White Whale (Delphinapterus Leucas)
- 2.2.3.6.3 Narwhal (Monodon monoceros)
- 2.2.3.6.4 Ice Seals
- 2.2.3.6.5 Walrus (Odobenus rosmarus)
- 2.2.3.6.6 Orca Whales (Orcinus orca)
- 2.2.3.6.7 Polar Bear (Ursus maritimus)
- 2.2.3.7 Birds
- 2.2.3.7.1 Black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla)
- 2.2.3.7.2 Black Guillemots (Cepphus grille)
- 2.2.3.7.3 Thick billed Murres (Uria lomvia)
- 2.2.3.7.4 Northern Fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis)
- 2.2.3.7.5 Common Eider (Somateria mollissima)
- 2.2.3.7.6 Little Auk/Dovekie (Alle alle)
- 2.2.3.7.7 Glaucous gull (Larus glaucescens)
- 2.2.3.7.8 Arctic jaeger (Stercorarius parasiticus)
- 2.2.4 Benthic Realm
- 2.2.4.1 Intertidal Communities
- 2.2.4.2 Shelf and Deepwater Communities
- 2.2.4.3 Mollusca
- 2.2.4.4 Polychaetes
- 2.2.4.5 Amphipods
- 2.2.4.6 Decapod Crustaceans
- 2.2.4.7 Echinoderms
- 2.2.5 Sea-Ice Realm
- 2.2.5.1 Ice Algae
- 2.2.5.2 Sympagic Copepods
- 2.2.5.3 Ice Amphipods
- 2.2.5.4 Pelagic Copepods
- 2.2.5.5 Sympagic Fish
- 2.2.5.6 Mammals
- 2.2.5.7 Birds
- 2.2.6 VECs of Arctic Marine Environments
- 2.2.6.1 Seasonal Distribution Patterns of Arctic Marine Populations
- 2.3 Future Research Considerations
- 2.3.1 Priority Recommendations to Enhance NEBA Applications in the Arctic
- 2.4 Further Information
- 3.0 THE TRANSPORT AND FATE OF OIL IN THE ARCTIC
- 3.1 Introduction
- 3.2 Knowledge Status
- 3.2.1 Weathering of Oil Spilled in Ice
- 3.2.2 Oil in Ice Interactions
- 3.2.3 Oil on Arctic Shorelines
- 3.2.4 Oil-Sediment Interactions
- 3.3 Future Research Considerations
- 3.3.1 Priority Recommendations for Enhanced NEBA Applications in the Arctic
- 3.4 Further Information
- 4.0 OIL SPILL RESPONSE STRATEGIES
- 4.1 Introduction
- 4.1.1 Environmental Uniqueness of the Arctic Region in Relation to OSR
- 4.2 Knowledge Status - Impact of OSRs
- 4.2.1 Natural Attentuation
- 4.2.1.1 Potential Environmental Impact of Untreated Oil
- 4.2.1.2 Conclusions on Natural Attenuation
- 4.2.2 Mechanical Recovery and Containment
- 4.2.2.1 Environmental impacts from Mechanical Recovery and Containment
- 4.2.2.2 Conclusions
- 4.2.3 In-Situ Burning and Chemical Herders
- 4.2.3.1 Potential environmental and human health effects of ISB residues and unburnt oil
- 4.2.3.2 Environmental Impact of Herders
- 4.2.3.3 Conclusions on ISB and Herders
- 4.2.4 Improving Dispersion of Oil
- 4.2.4.1 Impact of Chemically Dispersed Oil
- 4.2.4.2 Conclusions on Chemical Dispersion
- 4.2.4.3 Dispersing Oil using Oil Mineral Aggregates (OMA)
- 4.2.4.4 Environmental Impact of OMA formation
- 4.2.4.5 Conclusions on OMA
- 4.3 Future Research Considerations
- 4.3.1 Priority Recommendations for Enhanced NEBA Applications in the Arctic
- 4.4 Further Information
- 5.0 BIODEGRADATION
- 5.1 Introduction
- 5.1.1 The Microbiology of the Arctic Oceans
- 5.1.1.1 Transport routes
- 5.1.1.2 Microbial populations in the Arctic Ocean
- 5.1.2 Microbial Adaptation to Arctic Conditions
- 5.1.2.1 Low temperature and microbial adaptions
- 5.1.2.2 Light and microbial phototrophs
- 5.1.2.3 Marine ice and microbial survival and metabolism
- 5.2 Knowledge Status
- 5.2.1 Biodegradation of Oil in Cold Marine Environments
- 5.2.1.1 Types of Crude Oils
- 5.2.1.2 Surface oil spills
- 5.2.1.2.1 Evaporation
- 5.2.1.2.2 Water solubility
- 5.2.1.2.3 Photooxidation
- 5.2.1.2.4 Sedimentation
- 5.2.1.2.5 Water-in-oil emulsification
- 5.2.1.2.6 Natural dispersion
- 5.2.1.2.7 Oil films
- 5.2.1.3 Microbial Oil-Degrading Populations in Cold Water Environments
- 5.2.1.3.1 Indigenous Microorganism Populations
- 5.2.1.3.2 Population Effects on Oil Degradation
- 5.2.1.4 Hydrocarbon biodegradation in cold marine environments
- 5.2.1.4.1 Seawater
- 5.2.1.4.2 Sediments and soils
- 5.2.1.4.3 Sea ice
- 5.2.1.5 Modeling of biodegradation
- 5.2.1.5.1 Biodegradation in oil spill models
- 5.2.1.5.2 Biodegradation modeling and temperature
- 5.2.1.6 Determination of Biodegradation
- 5.2.1.6.1 Analytical methods for oil compound analyses
- 5.2.1.6.2 Experimental apparatus
- 5.2.1.6.3 Biodegradation data processing
- 5.2.1.7 Persistent Oil Compounds
- 5.2.2 Accelerated Biodegradation
- 5.2.2.1 Biostimulation
- 5.2.2.1.1 Shoreline sediments
- 5.2.2.1.2 Seawater
- 5.2.2.1.3 Marine ice
- 5.2.2.2 Bioaugmentation
- 5.2.2.3 Understanding Processes in Accelerated Biodegradation
- 5.3 Future Research Considerations
- 5.3.1 Priority Recommendations for Enhanced NEBA Applications in the Arctic
- 5.4 Further Information
- 6.0 ECOTOXICOLOGY OF OIL AND TREATED OIL IN THE ARCTIC
- 6.1 Introduction
- 6.1.1 General Methods and Relevant Endpoints in Laboratory Testing
- 6.1.1.1 Test Exposure
- 6.1.1.2 Test Media Preparation
- 6.1.1.2.1 Water Soluble Fractions (WSF)
- 6.1.1.2.2 Water Accommodated Fractions (WAF, CEWAF)
- 6.1.1.2.3 Oil-in-Water Dispersions (Oil Droplets)
- 6.1.1.2.4 Oil Type/Weathering
- 6.1.1.2.5 Exposure Concentrations
- 6.1.1.2.6 Test Organisms
- 6.1.1.2.7 Test Endpoints and Exposures
- 6.1.1.2.8 Data Extrapolation and Population Models
- 6.2 Knowledge Status
- 6.2.1 Species represented in the data set
- 6.2.2 Arctic ecosystem compartments in the dataset
- 6.2.2.1 Pack ice
- 6.2.2.2 Pelagic
- 6.2.2.3 Benthic
- 6.2.3 Review by Taxa
- 6.2.3.1 Phytoplankton and seaweed
- 6.2.3.2 Mysids
- 6.2.3.3 Copepods
- 6.2.3.4 Amphipods
- 6.2.3.5 Benthic organisms
- 6.2.3.6 Fish
- 6.3 Discussion
- 6.3.1 Petroleum related components
- 6.3.1.1 Crude oil
- 6.3.1.2 Single PAH
- 6.3.2 Chemically dispersed oil versus physically dispersed oil
- 6.3.3 Are Arctic species more sensitive than temperate species?
- 6.4 Future Research Considerations
- 6.4.1 Priority Recommendations to Enhance NEBA Applications in the Arctic
- 6.5 Further Information
- 7.0 POPULATION EFFECTS MODELING
- 7.1 Introduction
- 7.2 Knowledge Status
- 7.2.1 Parameters Needed to Assess Potential Responses of VECs to Environmental Stressors
- 7.2.1.1 Transport and fate / exposure potential
- 7.2.1.2 Oil toxicity evaluations / sensitivity
- 7.2.1.3 Population distributions, stressors, and mortality rates
- 7.2.2 Copepod Population Ecology
- 7.2.2.1 Copepod Growth and Development
- 7.2.2.2 Summary of Arctic and Sub-Arctic Copepod Species
- 7.2.3 Copepod Populations
- 7.2.4 Arctic Fish Population Ecology
- 7.2.4.1 Arctic Fish Species Diversity
- 7.2.4.2 Representative Fish Species
- 7.2.5 Application of Population Models
- 7.3 Future Research Considerations
- 7.3.1 Priority Recommendations to Enhance NEBA Applications in the Arctic
- 7.4 Further Information
- 8.0 ECOSYSTEM RECOVERY
- 8.1 Introduction
- 8.2 Knowledge Status
- 8.2.1 Resilience and Potential for Recovery
- 8.3 Future Research Considerations
- 8.3.1 Priority Recommendations for Enhanced NEBA Applications in the Arctic
- 8.4 Further Information
- 9.0 NET ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFIT ANALYSES FOR OIL SPILL
- 9.1 Introduction
- 9.2 Knowledge Status
- 9.2.1 Importance of NEBA Development for Arctic Regions
- 9.2.2 Scope and Applicability
- 9.2.3 Information Required to Utilize the NEBA Process
- 9.2.3.1 Potential oil spill scenarios
- 9.2.3.2 Response resources available
- 9.2.4 Ecological Resources at Risk
- 9.2.5 Social and Economic Relevance
- 9.2.6 Historical uses of NEBA and Case Studies
- 9.2.6.1 Assessing response strategy effectiveness and estimating oil fate and transport
- 9.2.6.2 Assessing the potential impacts and resource recovery rates
- 9.2.7 Historical Spills that Used or Informed NEBA Processes
- 9.2.7.1 A. Experimental: Baffin Island tests in northern Canada
- 9.2.7.2 B. Experimental: TROPICS study
- 9.2.7.3 C. Tanker: Braer Spill
- 9.2.7.4 D. Tanker: Sea Empress spill
- 9.2.7.5 E. Well Blowout: Montara spill (also known as the West Atlas Spill)
- 9.2.8 Potential Challenges to Applying NEBA Processes in the Arctic Environment
- 9.3 Future Research Considerations
- 9.3.1 Priority Recommendations for Enhanced NEBA Applications in the Arctic
- 9.4 Further Information
- APPENDIX: USE OF NEDRA IN CONNECTION TO OIL SPILL CONTINGENCY PLANNING IN NORWAY
- 10.0 SUPPORTING REPORTS
Add notes to:
Or add a reference to download later
7.2.1 Parameters Needed to Assess Potential Responses of VECs to Environmental Stressors
7.2.1.1 Transport and fate / exposure potential
Models have been developed that adequately address the transport and fate of surface oil spills (e.g. ASA 2011 and McKay 2009). These models take into account the effects of wind and surface currents and are useful predictions of the movement of oil at the surface and into the water column. They predict the concentrations of oil within a volume of water which permits the comparison of those exposure values to toxic effects based measurements of adverse effects observed in laboratory studies (Gallaway et al., in review). When oil is released at the surface of the water or at depth it begins to spread, thin and dilute into 2 or 3 dimensions. For surface spills the oil begins to spread primarily in a horizontal direction based on currents and wind-driven transport with the more soluble components diluting into the third or vertical dimension, which includes the water under the surfaced oil and release of the more volatile components to the atmosphere. Subsurface releases generally have an initial momentum that provides rapid dilution by entrainment of surrounding waters during the initial rise of the fluids from the bottom, driven by any jet turbulence from the simultaneous release of natural gasses and the natural buoyancy of the oil. This rapid dilution is followed by continued vertical transport based on the specific gravity or density and size of oil droplets created during the initial release including entrained diffusion of the more soluble components into the water column accompanied by horizontal dispersion by subsurface currents. Other processes that occur and which may influence the bioavailability of oil components include biodegradation processes and physical/chemical changes that may occur due to pressure changes (e.g. clathrate formation) or emulsion formations by incorporation of water into the oil mass. In addition to the physical contact of organisms with oil (e.g. fouling on birds) organisms also respond to the bioavailable chemical components that are present in water and food.
Another component of the fate evaluation for models is the change in chemical composition and bioavailability of oil that occurs during physical weathering and biological activity, mineralization and biodegradation. The relative contribution and total concentrations of oil compounds changes through time and the rate of change varies depending on the environmental compartment in which the oil resides. Surface oil that emulsifies undergoes less efficient biodegradation and appears to be less available for biological uptake into tissues than oil that is dispersed into the water column as small droplets. Oil that is stranded on beaches or within interstitial waters between grains of sediment also undergoes slower rates of biodegradation as demonstrated by the ‘lingering oil’ effects seen in Prince William Sound decades after its stranding. These important concepts are further developed in Sections 3 and 5 (fate of oil and biodegradation processes, respectively).
The transport and fate of a released quantity of oil has the potential to affect the population abundance, standing crop/production, increase daily mortality coefficients, and response to stressor exposure within different environmental compartments. Variation in these attributes for each environmental compartment are expected and assessments can be generated based on assumptions that are meant to provide a maximum level of effect using the most conservative estimates or to best characterize the distinctions between the compartments.
7.2.1.2 Oil toxicity evaluations / sensitivity
The bioavailable fractions of oil derived from the soluble compounds that are present during the initial release of the oil or in locations where oil becomes re-concentrated (e.g. at convergence zones, pycnoclines, shorelines, air/water and ice/water interfaces). As dilution of these compounds and biodegradation processes occur the relative and total concentrations may be reduced. Eventually, the concentrations of the soluble compounds decreases to the point that the acute effects may be replaced by more subtle, sublethal doses resulting in longer term exposure to lower but more constant concentrations of the remaining compounds. Measurements made during accidental and experimental spill events have shown that the higher total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentrations observed in the upper 3 m of the water column range from ~2 to 37 mg/L for physically dispersed oil and between 36 and 527 mg/L for chemically dispersed oil (Trudel et al., in press; Brandvik et al. 1995). The chemical dispersants introduced more oil into the water column but the effects based concentrations for measured petroleum compounds were less per unit of oil for the chemical dispersions (Gardiner et al., 2013). These field evaluations also showed reduced TPH concentrations of 50% within an hour and approximately 2 orders of magnitude differences in concentration within the upper 10 m of the water column for both physically and chemically dispersed oil.
Empirical studies of the acute toxicity of oil and its components or modeling the effects of complex mixture exposure and uptake are alternative methods for estimating the effects of oil in different compartments. For acute responses to oil exposure, including mortality and avoidance behaviors toward soluble components, toxicity testing is appropriate. The exposure regimen for this type of assessment has been developed to emulate field conditions observed during spill events and controlled experimental spill events that were described in the previous paragraph. The methods employ spiked concentrations of oil followed by dilutions with clean water to simulate the dispersion/dilution processes that occur in the field. There are a significant number of experiments that have been performed using this protocol and it provides a good characterization of the acute effects that might be expected from dynamic exposure concentration from an oil spill at the surface or a depth (refer to Section 6 on Ecotoxicology for further toxicological information). The longer term, chronic and sublethal responses of organisms can be modeled by using constant exposure to lower concentrations of oil that might occur with organisms drifting with the oil after the initial dispersion or those inhabiting contaminated sediments. There are also models that have been built to estimate the potential effects of the uptake of the bioavailable components into the tissues of organisms resulting in chronic responses to oil components. These models are based on the relative narcosis effect of many PAH compounds (Di Toro et al. 2007).
7.2.1.3 Population distributions, stressors, and mortality rates
Modeling population responses that can occur as a result of exposure to oil should include a representation of the temporal and spatial distribution of age classes of the VECs. The spatial evaluation needs to take into account the vertical and horizontal distribution of the abundance of each VEC and its relationship to key environmental components. Examples of environmental components include river discharges, lagoon occupation, annual and permanent ice, propensity to cluster at zones of convergences (e.g. currents, pycnoclines, upwelling and downwelling) and different types of shorelines and bottom types for each of the VEC age classes. The populations of VECs undergo different natural stressors within each of these habitats ranging from environmental exposure conditions, inter and intra-annular differences in environmental conditions, differences in spawning success and variable predation rates. As a result, the influence of an additional stressor will influence populations at different rates. These natural and ongoing impacts produce natural mortality rates that can be determined. For fish the daily mortality rates can be determined by examining daily growth rings on otoliths and the relative abundance of individuals at comparable ages. Invertebrates generally lack these types of structures and their mortality rates are based on the relative abundance of different size classes within a population. Once the natural mortality rates are estimated, the impact of another stressor can be added to determine what the combined mortality will be.
For example, a recent assessment of the acute effects of chemically dispersed oil into Arctic pelagic open ocean, ice-free waters on larval Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) was modeled to determine the adult female equivalents that would be lost as a result of a large oil spill (Gallaway et al., in review). The fisheries model obtained daily mortality rates from otolith assessments and applied toxicity information obtained by Gardiner et al. (2013) and assumed that a large oil spill would be at the center of the maximum population sizes observed. Comparing the increased mortality rates of the oil indicated that number of adult female equivalents impacted by the oil were a fraction of the natural range in abundance of this species. Based on these results the resiliency of the population of Arctic cod would be sufficient to recover during the following spawning year. Had the oil not been treated with dispersants it would have been transported toward shore where juvenile Arctic cod are present in very large schools numbering in the millions, and the Arctic cod population would be subjected to greater stress.
The following sections include technical information on copepod, amphipod, and fish population ecology and discuss the types of information necessary to assess the potential population effects of oil on two groups of species, copepods and fish.